今度は原爆反対派(一般市民への攻撃反対派)の見解をアップしておきます。うまくまとめられている文章が引用されていたのでそれを簡単に訳してみました。要点+α程度の訳なので全訳ではありません。大体指摘されるべき点は含まれているようです。

著者はパット・ブキャナン氏で、最も影響力、人気のある保守派論客の一人に数えられます。

◆ ◆ ◆



広島、長崎とキリスト者の道徳心

パトリック J ブキャナン



第二次大戦は、悪名高き南京やアウシュヴィッツの犯罪を犯した敵に対する正義の戦いではあったが、そのやり方にキリスト者として良心の呵責を感じるはずである。

広島と長崎の結果、よいことが起こったことは事実である。日本はすぐに降伏し、第二次大戦は終結し、全地域で日本兵は武器を捨てた。多くの人が救われ、その後日本は生き延びることもできた。

しかしその方法は道徳にかなっていただろうか?

トルーマン支持の人たちは、失われた命よりも救った命の方が多かった、あのショックがなければ戦争指導者たちはあきらめなかったろうと言う。

マッカーサー、アイゼンハワー、ハップ・アーノルド、カーティス・ルメイは、広島と長崎への原爆を必要ないと考えていたようだ。しかし最近見つかった文書によると、日本の指導者たちの決心は、今まで考えられていたよりもはるかに硬く、本土での決戦を最後まで続けるつもりだったらしい。

それでも、日本の指導者の気構えがどうであったにせよ、道徳の問題は残る。正義の戦いであれば、意図的に女子供を犠牲にしでても、敵の戦意をそぐべきか?伝統的には、キリスト者の答えはずっと「否」であった。

トルーマン擁護派は、本土進行していればアメリカ側に50万もの犠牲が出ていたとか、都市も軍事的標的であるなどと主張する。

だが、日本はB-29に対し守るすべがなく、海軍は太平洋の隅まで押し戻され、本土は海上封鎖され、上陸進行の必要があっただろうか?フィリピンではマッカーサーは、ラバウルのような日本の拠点を通り越し、補給路を断ち、兵糧攻めにするのが常であった。

トルーマンが広島、長崎を軍事ターゲットと見なしていたのなら、なぜ8月10日の閣議で第三の原爆投下をしたくないと言ったのか?「更にもう10万人を消し去るのは酷すぎる。」と彼は発言している。彼は子供たちを殺したくなかったのである。

このトルーマンの決定について、主席補佐官ウィリアム・リーヒは「この野蛮な武器の使用が、対日戦争において本当に役立ったとは言い難い。私は、アメリカが最初の使用者になったことにより、暗黒時代の野蛮な倫理観へと、我々自身をおとしめてしまったと感じる。そんな戦い方をしてはならない。私はそう教わったきた。」



Hiroshima, Nagasaki & Christian morality

Patrick J. Buchanan

On the 40th, 50th and 60th anniversaries of D-Day, Presidents Reagan, Clinton and George W. Bush traveled to Normandy to lead us in tribute to the bravery of the Greatest Generation of Americans, who had liberated Europe. Always a deeply moving occasion.

The 40th, 50th and 60th anniversaries of the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, however, were not times of celebration or warm remembrance. Angry arguments for and against the dropping of the bombs roil the airwaves and fill the press.

And the reason is obvious. While World War II was a just war against enemies whose crimes, from Nanking to Auschwitz, will live in infamy, the means we used must trouble any Christian conscience.

That good came out of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is undeniable. In a week, Japan surrendered, World War II ended and, across the Japanese empire, soldiers laid down their arms. Thousands of U.S. soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Japanese who would have perished in an invasion of Japan survived, as did Allied POWs who might have been executed on the orders of Japanese commanders when we landed.

But were the means used - the destruction in seconds of two cities, inflicting instant death on 120,000 men, women and children, and an agonizing death from burns and radiation on scores of thousands more - moral?

Truman's defenders argue that by using the bomb, he saved more lives than were lost in those cities. Only the atom bombs, they contend, could have shocked Japan's warlords into surrender.

But if terrorism is the massacre of innocents to break the will of rulers, were not Hiroshima and Nagasaki terrorism on a colossal scale?

Churchill did not deny what the Allied air war was about. Before departing for Yalta, he ordered Operation Thunderclap, a campaign to "de-house" civilians to clog roads so German soldiers could not move to stop the offensive of the Red Army. British Air Marshal "Bomber" Harris put Dresden, a jewel of a city and haven for hundreds of thousands of terrified refugees, on the target list.

On the first night, 770 Lancasters arrived around 10:00. In two waves, 650,000 incendiary bombs rained down, along with 1,474 tons of high explosives. The next morning, 500 B-17s arrived in two waves, with 300 fighter escorts to strafe fleeing survivors.

Estimates of the dead in the Dresden firestorm range from 35,000 to 250,000. Wrote the Associated Press, "Allied war chiefs have made the long-awaited decision to adopt deliberate terror bombing of German populated centers as a ruthless expedient to hasten Hitler's doom."

In a memo to his air chiefs, Churchill revealed what Dresden had been about, "It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts, should be reviewed."

Gens. MacArthur, Eisenhower, "Hap" Arnold and Curtis LeMay reportedly felt the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unnecessary. But recent documents have surfaced to show the Japanese warlords were far more determined to fight on to a bloody finish in the home islands than previously known.

Yet, whatever the mindset of Japan's warlords in August 1945, the moral question remains. In a just war against an evil enemy, is the deliberate slaughter of his women and children in the thousands justified to break his will to fight? Traditionally, the Christian's answer has been no.

Truman's defenders argue that the number of U.S. dead in any invasion would have been not 46,000, as one military estimate predicted, but 500,000. Others contend the cities were military targets.

But with Japan naked to our B-29s, her surface navy at the bottom of the Pacific, the home islands blockaded, what was the need to invade at all? On his island-hopping campaign back to the Philippines, MacArthur routinely bypassed Japanese strongholds like Rabaul, cut them off and left them to "rot on the vine."

And if Truman considered Hiroshima and Nagasaki military targets, why, in the Cabinet meeting of Aug. 10, as historian Ralph Raico relates, did he explain his reluctance to drop a third bomb thus: "The thought of wiping out another 100,000 people was too horrible," he said. He didn't like the idea of killing "all those kids."

Of Truman's decision, his own chief of staff, Adm. William Leahy, wrote: "This use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make wars in that fashion ..."

Only the blog author may view the comment.
http://kokusaitouron.blog.fc2.com/tb.php/74-f29faa80
Use trackback on this entry.
// HOME //
Powered By FC2 Blog. copyright © 2017 国際討論日記FC2 all rights reserved.
プロフィール

soudenjapan

Author:soudenjapan
soudenjapan、45歳、コンサルタント。やっと英語が楽になり20年かかって英語を握ったと感じる。と思ったのもつかの間、そこには広大な未知の領域が残っているようだ。

最新記事
最新コメント

月別アーカイブ
カテゴリ
検索フォーム

RSSリンクの表示
リンク